Skip to main content
Fifth Circuit· 7/21/1980

Doe v. Marshall

Citations

  • 622 F.2d 118
  • 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 15535

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that mootness \neither precludes nor is precluded by an award of attorneys' fees ... [which] turns instead on a wholly independent consideration: whether plaintiff is a 'prevailing party' \
  • “[A] determination of mootness neither precludes nor is precluded by an award of attorneys’ fees. The attorneys’ fees question turns instead on a wholly independent consideration: whether plaintiff is a ‘prevailing party.’ ”
  • “Thus, a determination of mootness neither precludes nor is precluded by an award of attorneys’ fees. The attorneys’ fees question turns instead on a wholly independent consideration: whether plaintiff is a ‘prevailing party.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.