Houston Chronicle Publishing Co. v. City of League City

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that petitioners had standing to mount facial and as-applied pre-enforcement challenge where petitioners showed “imminent future prosecution if the City is not enjoined”
• noting that the fact that the challenged law was applied only against the plaintiffs counseled against vacating the injunction
• finding sufficient narrow tailoring in a facial case where the Ordinance only prohibited roadway solicitation at certain high-traffic intersections
• city ordinance restricting the solicitation or distribution of any material to the occupant of a vehicle stopped at a traffic light served government’s compelling interest in public safety
• “It goes without saying that disputes concerning repealed legislation are generally moot.”
• “It goes without saying that disputes concerning repealed legislation are generally moot.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).