Doe v. Doe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that contingency fee in past-due support collection was permissible and could be considered in determining a reasonable statutory fee award, and remanding to district court for determination of a reasonable fee award in light of possibility for a contingent fee enhancement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Marquis & Aurbach v. Eighth Judicial District Court Ex Rel. County of Clark
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2006-11-30· cited 35×
• Jacoby v. Jacoby
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2014-12-31· cited 5×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean Air
  Supreme Court· 1987-06-26· cited 955×
• Schefke v. Reliable Collection Agency, Ltd.
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2001-10-11· cited 154×
• Chun v. Bd. of Trustees of ERS
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2000-02-02· cited 76×
• Montalvo v. Chang
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1982-02-25· cited 32×
• Lindsey v. Lindsey
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1986-03-05· cited 14×
• Smith v. Smith
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1982-12-15· cited 10×
• Fletcher v. Fletcher
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1992-04-15· cited 9×
• Eastmond v. Earl
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 1996-02-29· cited 7×