D. Connecticut· 6/19/1996
Doe v. Doe
Citations
- 929 F. Supp. 608
- 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8601
- 1996 WL 344026
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “whether a particular activity substantially affects interstate commerce is ‘ultimately a judicial rather than a legislative question’ ”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Arterton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. Nathan Wall (95-5007) and Donald Wall (95-5008)Sixth Circuit· 1996-10-22· cited 63×
- United States v. Christopher J. BaileyFourth Circuit· 1997-05-02· cited 53×
- Liu v. StriuliD. Rhode Island· 1999-01-19· cited 32×
- Doe v. HartzN.D. Iowa· 1997-06-23· cited 31×
- Crisonino v. New York City Housing AuthorityS.D. New York· 1997-11-18· cited 24×
- Seaton v. SeatonE.D. Tennessee· 1997-07-01· cited 18×
- Unnamed caseFourth Circuit· 1999-03-05· cited 17×
- Isidora M. v. Silvino M.California Court of Appeal· 2015-07-31· cited 16×
- United States v. GluzmanS.D. New York· 1997-01-17· cited 13×
- Unnamed caseFourth Circuit· 1997-12-23· cited 8×
- McCann v. BRYON L. ROSQUIST, DC, PCD. Utah· 1998-03-19· cited 6×
- Ziegler v. ZieglerE.D. Washington· 1998-11-05· cited 6×
- Timm v. DelongD. Nebraska· 1998-06-22· cited 5×
- Brzonkala v. Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State UniversityFourth Circuit· 1999-03-05· cited 5×
- United States v. WrightD. Nebraska· 1997-05-02· cited 4×
- Doe v. MercerD. Massachusetts· 1999-02-19· cited 4×
- Culberson v. DoanS.D. Ohio· 1999-04-08· cited 4×
- Brzonkala v. Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State UniversityFourth Circuit· 1997-12-23· cited 4×
- Bergeron v. BergeronM.D. Louisiana· 1999-05-28· cited 2×
- Burgess v. CahallD. Delaware· 2000-02-29
Cites
65 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court· 1993-06-07· cited 7,022×
- United States v. LopezSupreme Court· 1995-04-26· cited 3,052×
- National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court· 1937-04-12· cited 2,059×
- Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc.Supreme Court· 1981-06-15· cited 1,400×
- Wickard v. FilburnSupreme Court· 1942-11-09· cited 1,246×
- City of Riverside v. RiveraSupreme Court· 1986-06-27· cited 1,221×
- Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1965-01-25· cited 912×
- Perez v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1971-04-26· cited 647×
- Katzenbach v. McClungSupreme Court· 1964-12-14· cited 635×
- Wisconsin v. MitchellSupreme Court· 1993-06-11· cited 552×
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. WyomingSupreme Court· 1983-03-02· cited 504×
- Cheffer v. RenoEleventh Circuit· 1995-06-23· cited 249×
- United States v. Steve LeshukFourth Circuit· 1995-09-18· cited 211×
- United States v. John W. Bolton, A/K/A GinoTenth Circuit· 1995-10-17· cited 203×
- United States v. Regina Rene DinwiddieEighth Circuit· 1996-05-09· cited 179×
- United States v. Kevin Bishop, United States of America v. Edward StokesThird Circuit· 1995-09-29· cited 174×
- United States v. Cyril T. HannaNinth Circuit· 1995-08-09· cited 147×
- United States v. Donovan Dwayne Oliver Darryl Lee McMillan Nathaniel JonesNinth Circuit· 1995-07-06· cited 131×
- United States v. Kenneth L. BellSeventh Circuit· 1995-11-17· cited 111×
- United States v. ColemanFifth Circuit· 1996-03-05· cited 108×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.