United States v. Steve Leshuk

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• providing that constitutionality of Drug Act is not altered by fact that government need not show that specific conduct in each ease affected interstate commerce
• stating that Miranda warnings are not required when a person is questioned during a Terry stop
• upholding the congressional finding “that intrastate manufacture, distribution, and possession of controlled substances, as a class of activities, have a sub stantial and direct effect upon interstate” commerce
• “[H]andcuffing a suspect . . . does not necessarily elevate a lawful stop into a custodial arrest for Miranda purposes.”
• reasoning placing suspect into police car does not necessarily elevate the detention into custody for Miranda purposes
• affirming trial court’s refusal to suppress defendant’s voluntary statements made during a proper Terry stop

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).