Doe v. Burkland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that assisting cohabitant in career and providing homemaking, business, consulting and counseling services is not illegal consideration “irrespective of the fact that the parties may have been living together when they entered into the contract”
• “plaintiff should not have been allowed to unring the bell that he had been tolling for approximately nine months after he began this lawsuit in his own name”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).