Whorton v. Dillingham

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a same-sex, non-married cohabitant’s alleged services as a chauffeur, bodyguard, secretary, and business partner were, if proven true, sufficient independent consideration for the formation of a contract
• discussing the right to contract between same-sex cohabitants

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).