Skip to main content
W.D. Virginia· 3/31/2016

Doe v. Alger

Citations

  • 175 F. Supp. 3d 646
  • 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43402
  • 2016 WL 1274025

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an enrolled student at a public university who is dismissed for disciplinary reasons possesses no constitutionally-protected liberty interest
  • stating that while a student rights policy “may not itself create enforceable contract rights, it may nevertheless bear on whether [the student] had an entitlement to continued enrollment”
  • “Doe is not alleging that a state statute creates his property right, so Goss does not help him.”
  • adequacy of process at the appellate stage of a student disciplinary proceeding
  • “[The plaintiff] can cite no case in which the Supreme Court or Fourth Circuit has recognized a property right to continued enrollment in a public college or university—much less a case recognizing that the Commonwealth of Virginia has created such a right.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dillon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.