Skip to main content

Do v. Superior Court

Citations

  • 109 Cal. App. 4th 1210
  • 135 Cal. Rptr. 2d 855
  • 2003 Daily Journal DAR 6699
  • 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5291
  • 2003 Cal. App. LEXIS 907

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “It would ill serve the objectives of discovery statutes were we to conclude that, where a lawyer represents a party free of charge, the opponent may engage in discovery abuses with impunity”
  • “fees or monetary sanctions in the form of fees may be ordered .... whether or not a party actually ‘incurs’ additional fees as a result of the opposing party’s conduct as is the case here where the party is represented by a lawyer who does not charge a fee”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rylaarsdam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Do v. Superior Court

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.