District Court of Appeal of Florida· 5/25/2011
Dixon v. State
Citations
- 60 So. 3d 1179
- 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 7572
- 2011 WL 2023414
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that a second rule 3.850 motion could not be deemed successive to a first posteonviction motion that had' been dismissed as prematurely filed during the pendency of the direct appeal
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Altenbernd, Black, Kelly
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- Beaty v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1997-10-09· cited 47×
- Daniels v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1998-06-04· cited 44×
- Dixon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-10-20· cited 1×
- Dixon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-05-14· cited 1×
- Gore v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-04-01· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.