Skip to main content

Daniels v. State

Citations

  • 712 So. 2d 765
  • 1998 WL 286307

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a ruling on the merits of a postconviction motion rendered by the trial court during the pendency of a defendant’s direct appeal “is a nullity”
  • “[D]uring the pendency of a defendant’s direct appeal, the trial court is without jurisdiction to rule on a motion for postconviction relief.”
  • trial court lacks jurisdiction to rule on 3.850 motion during pendency of direct appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Overton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

43 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.