Nevada Supreme Court· 6/12/1987

Dixon v. State

Citations

737 P.2d 1162
103 Nev. 272
1987 Nev. LEXIS 1630

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that reasonable suspicion justified the field sobriety tests where the driver weaved across lanes, stumbled out of the vehicle, swayed while standing, and admitted to drinking three beers
holding that probable cause for arrest existed where defendant was driving erratically, smelled of alcohol, had slurred speech, had an inability to stand straight, had bloodshot, watery eyes, and failed a field sobriety test
holding that probable cause for arrest existed where defendant was driving erratically, smelled of alcohol, had slurred speech, had an inability to stand straight, had bloodshot, watery eyes, and failed a field sobriety test
holding that probable cause for arrest existed where defendant was driving erratically, smelled of alcohol, had slurred speech, had an inability to stand straight, had bloodshot, watery eyes, and failed a field sobriety test
holding that the third-offense felony provision was not an ex post facto law, despite the fact that the prior convictions antedated enactment of the provision, because the statute in effect at the time the defendant committed the subsequent offense informed him of the penalty

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.