Amundsen v. Jones

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that reasonable suspicion of drunk driving, based on weaving between lanes, continued through duration of field sobriety tests even though defendant’s “behavior during the stop did not provide additional evidence of impairment” (emphasis omitted)
• holding that reasonable suspicion of drunk driving, based on weaving between lanes, continued through duration of field sobriety tests even though defendant’s “behavior during the stop did not provide additional evidence of impairment” (cleaned up)
• noting that when a plaintiff has not carried the burden to produce evidence in a § 1983 context, the claim should not survive summary judgment
• “Because we may review only legal issues, we must accept any facts that the district court assumed in denying summary judgment.”
• “We have . . . held that drifting onto the shoulder twice creates reasonable suspicion of driving under the influence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).