Hawaii Supreme Court· 10/30/2003
Ditto v. McCurdy
Citations
- 78 P.3d 331
- 102 Haw. 518
- 2003 Haw. LEXIS 529
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- providing guidance regarding writs of execution and the applicability of the district court rules, which are also promulgated by the supreme court
- providing guidance regarding writs of execution and the applicability of the district court rules, which are also promulgated by the supreme court
- discussing the “express statutory requirements under part II of the HRS chapter 651 as to the form and content of a writ of execution”
- providing guidance to the circuit court and parties regarding writs of execution
- providing guidance to the circuit court and parties regarding writs of execution
- “Questions of law are reviewable de novo under the right/ wrong standard of review.” (Internal quotation marks and citation omitted.)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Moon, Levinson, Nakayama, Duffy, Acoba
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Best Place, Inc. v. Penn America Insurance Co.Hawaii Supreme Court· 1996-06-21· cited 165×
- Keliipuleole v. WilsonHawaii Supreme Court· 1997-06-10· cited 98×
- Shimabuku v. Montgomery Elevator Co.Hawaii Supreme Court· 1995-09-12· cited 56×
- Ditto v. McCurdyHawaii Supreme Court· 1997-11-06· cited 46×
- State v. BarancoHawaii Supreme Court· 1994-11-15· cited 42×
- Watt v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court· 1884-12-09· cited 38×
- Lincoln Lumber Co. v. ElstonNebraska Court of Appeals· 1993-04-27· cited 36×
- Faull v. CookeOregon Supreme Court· 1890-07-01· cited 30×
- State ex rel. Duggan v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court· 1922-11-27· cited 26×
- Ditto v. McCurdyHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1997-06-20· cited 18×
- Vitale v. Hotel California, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1982-03-18· cited 16×
- Southern California Lumber Co. v. Ocean Beach Hotel Co.California Supreme Court· 1892-03-31· cited 15×
- Waldrop v. Friedman & LovemanSupreme Court of Alabama· 1890-11-15· cited 12×
- Galaxy Steel & Tube, Inc. v. Douglass Coal & Wrecking, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals· 1996-09-12· cited 8×
- Chasnoff v. PortoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1953-08-04· cited 7×
- Ansonia B. and C. Co. v. . ConnerNew York Court of Appeals· 1886-11-23· cited 7×
- Willoughby v. DeweyIllinois Supreme Court· 1872-01-15· cited 5×
- Hicks v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1954-10-15· cited 4×
- Douglas v. WhitingIllinois Supreme Court· 1862-04-15· cited 4×
- Everett v. BollesHawaii Supreme Court· 1875-03-05· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.