Skip to main content
· 3/19/2009

Disciplinary Counsel v. McAuliffe

Citations

  • 2009 Ohio 1151
  • 121 Ohio St. 3d 315
  • 903 N.E.2d 1209

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \`a disciplinary proceeding is not an appropriate forum in which to collaterally attack a criminal conviction.'\ (quoting Bar Ass'n of Greater Cleveland v. Chvosta, 62 Ohio St.2d 429, 430, 406 N.E.2d 524 (1980))
  • \`a disciplinary proceeding is not an appropriate forum in which to collaterally attack a criminal conviction.'\ (quoting Bar Ass'n of Greater Cleveland v. Chvosta, 62 Ohio St.2d 429, 430, 406 N.E.2d 524 (1980))
  • “ ‘a disciplinary proceeding is not an appropriate forum in which to collaterally attack a criminal conviction’ ” (quoting Bar Ass’n of Greater Cleveland v. Chvosta, 62 Ohio St. 2d 429, 430, 406 N.E.2d 524 (1980))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moyer, Pfeifer, Stratton, O'Connor, O'Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.