Supreme Court· 2/20/2008

Danforth v. Minnesota

Citations

552 U.S. 264
128 S. Ct. 1029
169 L. Ed. 2d 859
2008 U.S. LEXIS 2012
21 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 66
76 U.S.L.W. 4069

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the rule of retroactivity of collateral attacks under Teague v. Lane, 489 U.S. 288, 109 S.Ct. 1060, 103 L.Ed.2d 334 (1989
holding that the rule of retroactivity of collateral attacks under Teague v. Lane, 489 U.S. 288, 109 S.Ct. 1060, 103 L.Ed.2d 334 (1989
holding that state can waive Teague non-retroactivity argument by not asserting it in a timely manner
holding that Teague does not constrain \the authority of state courts to give broader effect to new rules of criminal procedure than is required by that opinion\
holding that new rule in Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S. Ct. 2531 (2004), is procedural
holding that states can adopt their own rules about retroactivity as matter of procedure

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stevens

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

237 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

84 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.