Skip to main content
· 11/8/2022

Disciplinary Counsel v. Jarvis

Citations

  • 169 Ohio St. 3d 430
  • 205 N.E.3d 499
  • 2022 Ohio 3936

Syllabus

Attorneys—Misconduct—Violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct, including failing to act with reasonable diligence in representing a client, failing to reasonably consult with a client about the means by which the client's objectives are to be accomplished, failing to maintain a normal lawyer-client relationship with a client when the client's capacity to make considered decisions is diminished, and engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation—Eighteen-month suspension stayed on conditions.

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.