Disciplinary Counsel v. VanBibber
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 1702
Syllabus
Attorneys—Misconduct—Violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct stemming from multiple traffic violations, failure to comply with court orders, mismanagement of client trust account, and failure to cooperate in disciplinary investigation—Conditionally stayed two-year suspension.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding a sentence is reasonable when “the record as a whole reflects 3 Section 3553(a
- noting that a defendant released at age 51 would be “sufficiently active and capable . . . to do considerable damage” especially in light of his “strongly held beliefs” and “willingness to attack American interests”
- “Section 3553(a)(1) identifies ‘the history and characteristics of the defendant’ as one of the factors to consider in imposing a sentence.”
- “It is clear that we are to afford significant deference to a district court’s sentencing decision.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.