Louisiana Court of Appeal· 8/31/1989
Directional Wireline Services v. Tillett
Citations
- 552 So. 2d 1201
- 1989 WL 144531
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that parties’ failure to agree as to the method used to calculate “book value” of stock to be purchased precluded meeting of the minds as to essential element of price
- holding that parties' failure to agree as to the method used to calculate \book value\ of stock to be purchased precluded meeting of the minds as to essential element of price
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Carter, Lanier and Leblanc
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Richard L. Conkling v. Bert S. TurnerFifth Circuit· 1994-06-13· cited 265×
- Palowsky v. Premier Bancorp, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1992-03-06· cited 39×
- Willis v. LeTulleLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1992-03-06· cited 34×
- Lawrence v. Terral Seed, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2001-09-26· cited 20×
- Herbert v. Placid Refining Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1990-06-26· cited 20×
- Hess v. M & C Insurance, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2015-02-11· cited 13×
- Shahla v. City of Port AllenLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1992-05-22· cited 12×
- Ales v. SewellLouisiana Court of Appeal· 2001-10-17· cited 8×
- McKneely v. McKneelyLouisiana Court of Appeal· 2000-06-14· cited 7×
- First Nat. Bank v. CarrLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1990-12-18· cited 7×
- Thornton ex rel. Laneco Construction Systems, Inc. v.. LanehartLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1998-12-28· cited 7×
- Kok v. HarrisLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1990-05-30· cited 3×
- Hayward v. HaywardLouisiana Court of Appeal· 2009-02-13· cited 1×
- Conkling v. TurnerFifth Circuit· 1994-04-19
- Lisa Geter v. Brandy GardnerMississippi Supreme Court· 1996-02-26
- Directional Wireline Services, Inc. v. TillettSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1989-11-17
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- McLean v. HunterSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1986-10-20· cited 224×
- Benglis Sash & Door Co. v. LeonardsSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1980-11-04· cited 35×
- Ketcher v. Illinois Central Gulf R. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1983-10-11· cited 34×
- Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. CONSOL. TERMINAL WAREHOUSE, INC.Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1984-11-20· cited 29×
- McGowan v. RameyLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1986-02-25· cited 26×
- Steadman v. SOUTH CEN. BELL TEL. CO.Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1978-08-28· cited 26×
- Muslow v. AG Edwards & Sons, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1987-06-10· cited 25×
- Sherman v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1982-04-13· cited 15×
- State ex rel. Bourdette v. New Orleans Gaslight Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1897-06-25· cited 14×
- Lake v. Le JeuneSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1954-07-02· cited 13×
- Naquin v. Air Engineered Systems & Services, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1985-01-30· cited 11×
- Matherne v. Response Instrument Service & Engineering Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1988-10-12· cited 11×
- Breaux v. South Louisiana Elec. Co-Op. Ass'nLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1985-06-25· cited 8×
- Naquin v. AIR ENGINEERED SYSTEMS, ETC.Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1982-11-12· cited 7×
- Redemer v. HollisLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1977-05-23· cited 7×
- Princeville Canning Company v. HamiltonLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1963-12-16· cited 6×
- Lanaux v. Ace Production, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1981-03-10· cited 5×
- Directional Wireline Services, Inc. v. TillettLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1989-04-21· cited 4×
- Landry v. Calcasieu Marine Nat. BankLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1988-06-22· cited 4×
- Brandt Glass Co. v. New Orleans Housing Mart, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1966-12-05· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.