Skip to main content
· 10/20/1986

McLean v. Hunter

Citations

  • 495 So. 2d 1298

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Explaining that the purpose of requiring a proffer is to preserve excluded testimony so that it is available for appellate review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Calogero

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.