DiNatale v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Flora full payment rule barred a tax refund suit when deficiencies, penalties, and interest assessed had not been paid in full

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• John G. Rocovich, Jr. v. The United States
  Federal Circuit· 1991-05-15· cited 542×
• Sig and Barbara Shore v. United States
  Federal Circuit· 1993-11-16· cited 160×
• Skillo v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2005-11-30· cited 60×
• Thomas v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2003-04-07· cited 40×
• Lambropoulos v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1989-09-26· cited 12×
• Katz v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1991-04-03· cited 12×
• Schiff v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1991-09-19· cited 11×
• Rocovich v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1989-10-16· cited 10×
• Rohmann v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1992-02-11· cited 10×
• Abruzzo v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1991-12-18· cited 7×
• Magee v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1991-12-04· cited 5×
• Shore v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1992-08-21· cited 2×
• Mendu v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2021-04-07
• ESTATE OF ROBERT F. ARMITAGE v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2025-04-07

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Flora v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1960-03-21· cited 797×
• Flora v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1958-06-16· cited 401×
• Saunooke v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1985-06-05· cited 27×
• Green
  Court of Claims· 1979-06-22· cited 15×
• Frise v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1984-07-11· cited 14×