Skip to main content
· 6/5/1985

Saunooke v. United States

Citations

  • 8 Cl. Ct. 327
  • 56 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5191
  • 1985 U.S. Claims LEXIS 969

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating an inmate’s refusal to comply with DNA sampling may be enforced using administrative punishments because DNA testing is administrative, not penal
  • \The procedures may be changed at the will of prison officials so long as they afford that process which is due under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.\
  • “The procedures may be changed at the will of prison officials so long as they afford that process which is due under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment”
  • “The procedures may be changed at the will of prison officials so long as they afford that process which is due under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nettesheim

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.