Oregon Supreme Court· 5/25/1960

Dilger v. School District 24CJ

Citations

352 P.2d 564
222 Or. 108
1960 Ore. LEXIS 489

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“It is axiomatic that the courts cannot in the guise of construction supply an integral part of a statutory scheme omitted by the legislature.”
\It is axiomatic that the courts cannot in the guise of construction supply an integral part of a statutory scheme omitted by the legislature.\
\It is axiomatic that the courts cannot in the guise of construction 14 supply an integral part of a statutory scheme omitted by the legislature.\
“It is axiomatic that the courts cannot in the guise of construction supply an integral part of a statutory scheme omitted by the legislature.”
“[i]t is axiomatic that the courts cannot in the guise of construction supply an integral part of a statutory scheme omitted by the legislature”
“If necessary to carry out the intention of the legislature it is proper to construe the word ‘may' as meaning ‘shall.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McAllister, Rossman, Warner, Perry, Sloan, O'Connell, Goodwin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.