Diggs v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• no abuse of discretion in denying relief under G. L. c. 211, § 3, for claims that could have been raised during ordinary course of trial and appeal, or through motion or motions pursuant to Mass. R. Crim. P. 30, as appearing in 435 Mass. 1501 [2001]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Rodriguez v. Spencer
  First Circuit· 2005-06-15· cited 26×
• Cook v. Carlson
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2003-11-20· cited 4×
• Asadoorian v. Commonwealth
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2003-11-20· cited 1×
• Feinman v. New Bedford Division
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2006-05-15· cited 1×
• Benyamin v. City Manager
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2004-01-06

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Gorod v. Tabachnick
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1998-07-17· cited 56×
• Soja v. T. P. Sampson Co.
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1977-11-09· cited 52×
• Foley v. Lowell Division of the District Court Department
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1986-12-15· cited 42×
• Bates v. Commonwealth
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2001-07-17· cited 9×
• Diggs v. Commonwealth
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1999-06-22· cited 3×
• Dempsey v. District Attorney
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1999-06-15· cited 1×