· 11/9/1977
Soja v. T. P. Sampson Co.
Citations
- 369 N.E.2d 975
- 373 Mass. 630
- 1977 Mass. LEXIS 1117
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Our cases have emphasized that relief trader G. L. c. 211, § 3, may not be sought merely as a substitute for normal appellate review”
- general superintendence power to be exercised “sparingly,” and not “merely as a substitute for normal appellate review”
- “Our cases have emphasized that relief under G. L. c. 211, § 3, may not be sought merely as a substitute for normal appellate review”
- petition under G. L. c. 211, § 3
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hennessey, Quirico, Kaplan, Wilkins
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.