Skip to main content
· 11/9/1977

Soja v. T. P. Sampson Co.

Citations

  • 369 N.E.2d 975
  • 373 Mass. 630
  • 1977 Mass. LEXIS 1117

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Our cases have emphasized that relief trader G. L. c. 211, § 3, may not be sought merely as a substitute for normal appellate review”
  • general superintendence power to be exercised “sparingly,” and not “merely as a substitute for normal appellate review”
  • “Our cases have emphasized that relief under G. L. c. 211, § 3, may not be sought merely as a substitute for normal appellate review”
  • petition under G. L. c. 211, § 3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hennessey, Quirico, Kaplan, Wilkins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.