Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 6/19/1978
Digby v. Digby
Citations
- 388 A.2d 1
- 120 R.I. 299
- 1978 R.I. LEXIS 679
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- abrogation of doctrine of interspousal immunity applied to case at bar and to all cases arising sixty days or more after date of filing of opinion
- new rule effective sixty days after date of opinion
- granting a brief stay of prospective abrogation of interspousal immunity
- abrogated as to torts arising from auto accidents
- Rule abrogated as to motor torts
- Rule abrogated as to motor torts
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bevilacqua, Joslin, Kelleher, Doris, Weisberger
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Boblitz v. BoblitzCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1983-06-30· cited 95×
- Donna Reilly v. United StatesSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1988-08-05· cited 70×
- Silva v. SilvaSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1982-06-08· cited 63×
- Sitzes v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court· 1982-03-23· cited 61×
- Price v. PriceTexas Supreme Court· 1987-06-24· cited 61×
- Shook v. CrabbSupreme Court of Iowa· 1979-07-25· cited 54×
- Peters v. PetersHawaii Supreme Court· 1981-10-06· cited 50×
- Raisen v. RaisenSupreme Court of Florida· 1979-12-20· cited 49×
- Heino v. HarperOregon Supreme Court· 1988-08-02· cited 47×
- MacDonald v. MacDonaldSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1980-03-12· cited 47×
- Bozman v. BozmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2003-08-12· cited 43×
- Burns v. BurnsMississippi Supreme Court· 1988-01-13· cited 35×
- Miller v. Fallon CountyMontana Supreme Court· 1986-06-26· cited 34×
- State v. ArpinSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1980-02-07· cited 34×
- McInnis v. Harley-Davidson Motor Co., Inc.D. Rhode Island· 1986-01-14· cited 32×
- Bonkowsky v. BonkowskyOhio Supreme Court· 1982-02-10· cited 29×
- Morales v. Town of JohnstonSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 2006-04-26· cited 27×
- Seitz v. L & R INDUSTRIES, INC., ETC.Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1981-12-04· cited 27×
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1979-02-09· cited 24×
- Guffy Ex Rel. Reeves v. GuffySupreme Court of Kansas· 1981-07-17· cited 23×
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Woods v. LancetNew York Court of Appeals· 1951-12-06· cited 477×
- Immer v. RiskoSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1970-07-10· cited 153×
- Rupert Ex Rel. Rupert v. StienneNevada Supreme Court· 1974-12-02· cited 152×
- Klein v. KleinCalifornia Supreme Court· 1962-11-09· cited 125×
- Freehe v. FreeheWashington Supreme Court· 1972-08-31· cited 123×
- Becker v. BeaudoinSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1970-02-09· cited 102×
- Brooks v. RobinsonIndiana Supreme Court· 1972-07-10· cited 101×
- Lewis v. LewisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1976-07-09· cited 86×
- Beaudette v. FranaSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1969-12-19· cited 84×
- Ritter v. Narragansett Electric CompanySupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1971-11-01· cited 83×
- Self v. SelfCalifornia Supreme Court· 1962-11-09· cited 66×
- Maestas v. OvertonNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1975-02-21· cited 55×
- People v. HowkCalifornia Supreme Court· 1961-10-13· cited 48×
- Flores v. FloresNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1973-01-19· cited 41×
- Zarrella v. MillerSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1966-03-17· cited 38×
- Castellucci v. CastellucciSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1963-03-08· cited 36×
- Henry v. John W. Eshelman & SonsSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1965-04-13· cited 31×
- Rampone v. Wanskuck Buildings, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1967-03-27· cited 25×
- Benevides v. KellySupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1960-02-10· cited 14×
- Trotti v. PiacenteSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1965-01-19· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.