Diffendal v. Kash and Karry Service Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that transcript of conversation was not properly before court on summary judgment motion in absence of sworn statement from authenticating witness
• “Ordinarily, contributory negligence is a question for the jury.”
• “Ordinarily, contributory negligence is a question for the jury.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).