· 10/5/1994
Dietz v. Ramuda
Citations
- 882 P.2d 618
- 130 Or. App. 397
- 1994 Ore. App. LEXIS 1446
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- upholding disallowance of a claim where a preexisting, albeit asymptomatic, condition had been deemed the major contributing cause, notwithstanding the agreement of all five physicians who testified that the workplace had precipitated the injury
- stating rule regarding combined conditions
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Deits, Riggs, Haselton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.