Dierking v. Bellas Hess Superstore, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• requiring proof defendant “knowingly took a position with the intention that it be acted upon”
• holding the plaintiffs failed to meet the reliance requirement when they had the \means of knowledge readily available\ to know the exact date of the injury despite the defendant's alleged misrepresentation that the injury had occurred on a certain date
• “D. Reliance on such fraudulent statement or concealment by the party to whom made resulting in his prejudice.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).