Holden v. Construction MacHinery Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding this is true even where no actual damages can be shown
• affirming order requiring payment of increased compensation plaintiff would have received had he not been denied promised employment
• refusing to apply “estoppel and laches upon the basis of [the defendants’] own concealments, misleading tactics and misrepresentations”
• describing appointment of a receiver to be \addressed to the court's sound legal discretion\
• involving litigation between shareholders in which the corporation “CMC is unquestionably a nominal or passive, though real, party defendant and as such it was required to 12 adopt a neutral position with regard to this litigation”
• in equity court, intentional acts of fraud include all acts, omissions, and concealments that involve a breach of either legal or equitable duties that injure another or give one an undue or unconscionable advantage

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).