Appellate Court of Illinois· 3/18/2002
Diehl v. Polo Cooperative Ass'n
Citations
- 766 N.E.2d 317
- 328 Ill. App. 3d 576
- 262 Ill. Dec. 697
- 2002 Ill. App. LEXIS 177
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “An injury will be found to be beyond the scope of the defendant’s duty if it appears highly extraordinary that the breach of the duty should have caused the particular injury.”
- proximate cause is generally a question of fact
- proximate cause is generally a question of fact
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Callum
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- West Bend Mutual Insurance v. Mulligan Masonry Co.Appellate Court of Illinois· 2003-03-24· cited 21×
- Vorpagel v. Maxell Corp. of AmericaAppellate Court of Illinois· 2002-08-21· cited 13×
- Board of Education of Indian Prairie School District No. 204 v. Du Page County Election CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois· 2003-07-15· cited 9×
- Enbridge Energy, Ltd. Partnership v. Village of RomeovilleAppellate Court of Illinois· 2020-06-08· cited 6×
- Atherton v. CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INS.Appellate Court of Illinois· 2011-08-22· cited 3×
- Atherton v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois· 2011-08-22· cited 2×
- Flick v. Southern Illinois Healthcare, NFPAppellate Court of Illinois· 2014-12-22· cited 1×
- Vorpagel v. Maxell Corporation of AmericaAppellate Court of Illinois· 2002-08-21
- Board of Education of Indian Prairie School District No. 204 v. Du Page County Election Comm'n.Appellate Court of Illinois· 2003-07-15
- West Bend Mutual Insurance Co. v. Mulligan Masonry Co.Appellate Court of Illinois· 2003-03-24
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court· 1992-06-24· cited 2,631×
- Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court· 1984-06-26· cited 1,423×
- Billy Joe Shaw v. Dow Brands, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 1993-07-13· cited 307×
- Zekman v. Direct American Marketers, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court· 1998-05-21· cited 185×
- Papas v. Upjohn Co.Eleventh Circuit· 1993-03-08· cited 155×
- Worm v. American Cyanamid Co.Fourth Circuit· 1993-09-15· cited 145×
- Buchaklian v. Lake County Family Young Men's Christian Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois· 2000-04-18· cited 67×
- Castro v. Brown's Chicken and Pasta, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois· 2000-06-15· cited 58×
- Charles H. Kuiper, Sr., Mae E. Kuiper, and Charles A. Kuiper, Jr., D/B/A Charles H. Kuiper & Son Farms v. American Cyanamid CompanySeventh Circuit· 1997-12-05· cited 49×
- Salinas v. Chicago Park DistrictAppellate Court of Illinois· 1989-09-19· cited 48×
- Malone v. American Cyanamid Co.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1995-04-13· cited 36×
- Masotti v. ConsoleAppellate Court of Illinois· 1990-03-29· cited 27×
- Englund v. EnglundAppellate Court of Illinois· 1993-06-18· cited 22×
- Bickerman v. WosikAppellate Court of Illinois· 1993-05-28· cited 14×
- Casper v. EI Du Pont De Nemours and Co.E.D. Washington· 1992-11-02· cited 10×
- Prather v. Ciba-Geigy Corp.W.D. Louisiana· 1994-05-17· cited 8×
Other cases named Diehl v. Polo Cooperative Ass'n
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.