D. New Mexico· 3/21/1996
Diaz v. Salazar
Citations
- 924 F. Supp. 1088
- 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11010
- 1996 WL 220738
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that “[a]l-though a knife is a deadly weapon, its mere status as such does not create the justification for the use of deadly force”
- “The fact that their conduct may not have conformed with police regulations or training does not operate to create constitutional liability under Section 1983.”
- “The fact that their conduct may not have conformed with police regulations or training does not operate to create constitutional liability under Section 1983.”
- knife without additional aggressive conduct does not render a suspect an immediate threat
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hansen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Allen v. MuskogeeTenth Circuit· 1997-07-17· cited 178×
- Allen v. Muskogee OklahomaTenth Circuit· 1997-07-17· cited 83×
- Tanner v. San Juan County Sheriff's OfficeD. New Mexico· 2012-03-21· cited 37×
- James v. ChavezD. New Mexico· 2011-11-09· cited 36×
- Chappell v. City of ClevelandN.D. Ohio· 2008-09-30· cited 21×
- Jonas v. BOARD OF COMM'RS OF LUNA COUNTYD. New Mexico· 2010-03-10· cited 12×
- Dorato v. SmithD. New Mexico· 2015-05-26· cited 11×
- Nelson v. City of AlbuquerqueD. New Mexico· 2017-10-20· cited 10×
- González-Pérez v. Gómez-ÁguilaD. Puerto Rico· 2003-11-20· cited 8×
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. HillCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2001-07-03· cited 7×
- Stewart v. City of Prairie VillageD. Kansas· 2012-10-17· cited 7×
- Martin v. City of AlbuquerqueD. New Mexico· 2015-11-17· cited 6×
- Mata v. City of FarmingtonD. New Mexico· 2011-06-17· cited 5×
- Gonzalez-Perez v. Gomez-AguilaD. Puerto Rico· 2003-11-20· cited 2×
Cites
37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court· 1986-03-26· cited 58,760×
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court· 1978-06-06· cited 41,449×
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court· 1982-06-24· cited 22,846×
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court· 1989-05-15· cited 16,485×
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court· 1989-02-28· cited 10,043×
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1986-01-21· cited 7,676×
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court· 1962-05-14· cited 7,008×
- Pembaur v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court· 1986-03-25· cited 6,061×
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court· 1980-12-09· cited 4,909×
- DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court· 1989-02-22· cited 4,564×
- Tennessee v. GarnerSupreme Court· 1985-03-27· cited 4,272×
- City of Oklahoma v. TuttleSupreme Court· 1985-08-14· cited 3,810×
- California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court· 1991-04-23· cited 3,670×
- City of St. Louis v. PraprotnikSupreme Court· 1988-03-02· cited 3,553×
- Collins v. City of Harker HeightsSupreme Court· 1992-02-26· cited 3,302×
- Siegert v. GilleySupreme Court· 1991-05-23· cited 2,725×
- Davis v. SchererSupreme Court· 1984-08-16· cited 2,605×
- Brower Ex Rel. Estate of Caldwell v. County of InyoSupreme Court· 1989-03-21· cited 1,476×
- Carlos A. Gutierrez-Rodriguez v. Desiderio Cartagena and Domingo Alvarez, Carlos A. Gutierrez-Rodriguez v. Pedro N. Soto and Edwin F. GotayFirst Circuit· 1989-08-17· cited 552×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.