Skip to main content

Diaz v. Eli Lilly & Co.

Citations

  • 302 N.E.2d 555
  • 364 Mass. 153
  • 1973 Mass. LEXIS 491

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that either spouse may assert consortium claim arising from negligent injury to other spouse
  • recognizing a right of recovery for negligent deprivation of consortium of either spouse
  • recognizing loss of consortium claims and overruling 1909 case that disallowed such claims
  • a claim for loss of consortium arises “from the personal injury of the other spouse caused by the negligence of a third person”
  • the claim for loss of consortium involves the “loss of companionship and affection, of sexual enjoyment and the prospects of [parenthood]”
  • “a [spouse’s] claim for loss of consortium . . . arise[s] from personal injury of the other spouse caused by negligence of a third person”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tauro, Reardon, Quirico, Braucher, Hennessey, Kaplan, Wilkins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

124 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Diaz v. Eli Lilly & Co.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.