Diaz v. Bernini

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that, regarding ancillary jurisdiction for claims under RCFC 24(a)(2), “[t]he [United States Court of Appeals for the] Federal Circuit has not specifically addressed this issue”
• denying permissive intervention because applicant did not demonstrate that the court “ha[d] independent subject matter jurisdiction over [applicant’s] claims or defenses”
• denying the motion to intervene of a rival successor-in-interest, “The Cherokee Nation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).