D.H. Holmes Dept. Store v. Feil

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \The alleged representation that defendants would effect a permanent removal of plaintiffs' facial hair\ was not a material fact because it \related to a future event.\
• statement that a treatment would effect a permanent removal of plaintiffs’ facial hair related to a future event, and the treatments failure to successfully do so was not evidence of a present intent to deceive when the statement was made.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).