· 11/10/1993
Dewitz Ex Rel. Nuestel v. Emery
Citations
- 508 N.W.2d 334
- 1993 N.D. LEXIS 215
- 1993 WL 457201
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that first time disclosure of expert and his opinions was untimely and court did not abuse its discretion when it excluded expert at trial under its inherent authority to sanction
- holding that first time disclosure of expert and his opinions was untimely and court did not abuse its discretion when it excluded expert at trial under its inherent authority to sanction
- to be seasonable, a supplemental response must be made in reasonable time before trial taking into account the purpose of the rule to eliminate surprise at trial
- discussing N.D. Cent. Code § 32-03.2-06
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Levine, Meschke, Neumann, Sandstrom, Vande, Walle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.