Skip to main content
· 11/10/1993

Dewitz Ex Rel. Nuestel v. Emery

Citations

  • 508 N.W.2d 334
  • 1993 N.D. LEXIS 215
  • 1993 WL 457201

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that first time disclosure of expert and his opinions was untimely and court did not abuse its discretion when it excluded expert at trial under its inherent authority to sanction
  • holding that first time disclosure of expert and his opinions was untimely and court did not abuse its discretion when it excluded expert at trial under its inherent authority to sanction
  • to be seasonable, a supplemental response must be made in reasonable time before trial taking into account the purpose of the rule to eliminate surprise at trial
  • discussing N.D. Cent. Code § 32-03.2-06

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Levine, Meschke, Neumann, Sandstrom, Vande, Walle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.