Dewan v. Dewan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[i]t is, of course, common currency, that a judge faced with conflicting expert evidence, may accept or reject all or parts of the opinions offered”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Downey v. Downey
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2002-09-12· cited 22×
• Charara v. Yatim
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2010-11-23· cited 17×
• Sampson v. Sampson
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2004-10-29· cited 16×
• Child v. Child
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2003-05-12· cited 11×
• Guardianship of Brandon
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1997-03-13· cited 8×
• In re the Marriage of Wright
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2001-07-26· cited 3×
• In Re Marriage of Wright
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2001-07-26· cited 2×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re Marriage of Gillmore
  California Supreme Court· 1981-06-08· cited 113×
• Drapek v. Drapek
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1987-02-17· cited 72×
• Fechtor v. Fechtor
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1989-02-14· cited 55×
• Robbins v. Robbins
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1985-03-28· cited 40×
• Dewan v. Dewan
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1987-04-23· cited 34×
• Dewan v. Dewan
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1983-11-16· cited 27×
• Mattox v. Mattox
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1987-02-10· cited 26×
• Kilbride v. Kilbride
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1988-10-18· cited 26×
• Marriage of Petschel v. Petschel
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1987-06-09· cited 7×