Massachusetts Appeals Court· 10/29/2004
Sampson v. Sampson
Citations
- 62 Mass. App. Ct. 366
- 816 N.E.2d 999
- 2004 Mass. App. LEXIS 1223
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- present value of husband's nonvested pension, assuming retirement at age fifty-five years, awarded to marital estate
- present value of husband’s non-vested pension, assuming retirement at age fifty-five years, awarded to marital estate
- durational limit not warranted where “simply uncertain” that wife, sole proprietor of small business, could generate future income that would render alimony unnecessary
- \The judge's own findings cast doubt on the wife's present ability to meet her ordinary needs\
- property division vacated where judge's purported equal division was inequitable
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kafker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Adams v. AdamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2011-04-14· cited 66×
- Zaleski v. ZaleskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2014-08-01· cited 66×
- Hassey v. HasseyMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2014-06-25· cited 28×
- Wasson v. WassonMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2012-04-11· cited 26×
- Bernier v. BernierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2007-09-14· cited 25×
- Croak v. BergeronMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2006-11-16· cited 23×
- Casey v. CaseyMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2011-06-07· cited 21×
- Adlakha v. AdlakhaMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2006-03-31· cited 14×
- Fehrm-Cappuccino v. CappuccinoMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2016-10-18· cited 13×
- Oudheusden v. OudheusdenSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2021-04-27· cited 6×
- T.E. v. A.O.Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2012-10-09· cited 4×
- Crane v. CraneMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2018-05-17
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Grunfeld v. GrunfeldNew York Court of Appeals· 2000-05-11· cited 89×
- Williams v. MassaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2000-05-25· cited 83×
- Redding v. ReddingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1986-07-17· cited 82×
- Grubert v. GrubertMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1985-09-24· cited 80×
- Fechtor v. FechtorMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1989-02-14· cited 55×
- Dalessio v. DalessioMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1991-04-29· cited 47×
- Mahoney v. MahoneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1997-07-14· cited 45×
- Dewan v. DewanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1987-04-23· cited 34×
- Harriet T. Righter, of the Estate of Jessie H. Righter v. The United StatesCourt of Claims· 1971-03-19· cited 30×
- Neuman v. NeumanWyoming Supreme Court· 1992-11-30· cited 30×
- Rattee v. RatteeSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2001-02-15· cited 29×
- Champion v. ChampionMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2002-03-19· cited 22×
- Early v. EarlyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1992-12-09· cited 21×
- Goldman v. GoldmanMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1990-05-24· cited 21×
- D.L. v. G.L.Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2004-07-16· cited 20×
- Partridge v. PartridgeMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1982-06-16· cited 16×
- Katz v. KatzMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2002-07-19· cited 13×
- Rosenberg v. RosenbergMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1992-07-21· cited 11×
- Turners Falls Ltd. Partnership v. Board of AssessorsMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2002-05-14· cited 11×
- Cookson v. CooksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-05-17· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.