Derrick v. Drolson Co. Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that whether the person served was an agent authorized to accept service on behalf of a corporation was “clearly one of fact”
• “According to the notes of the Advisory Committee, Rule 4.03(c) was intended to ‘permit service upon agents so authorized under common law principles of agency.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).