DePineda v. Hemphill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• imposing sua sponte sanctions on a criminal defendant who filed eleven pro se appeals in approximately six years

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• DePineda v. Price
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1996-04-15· cited 373×
• Nutter v. Wefald
  D. Kansas· 1995-03-16· cited 23×
• DePINEDA v. HEMPHILL
  Tenth Circuit· 1994-08-29· cited 18×
• Federal National Mortgage Ass'n v. Milasinovich
  D. New Mexico· 2016-03-30· cited 17×
• Jaramillo v. Frewing
  D. New Mexico· 2018-08-28· cited 3×
• Johnson v. Serelson
  Tenth Circuit· 2001-12-05· cited 2×
• Benjamin J. Roscoe v. Honorable C. Leroy Hansen
  Tenth Circuit· 1997-03-17
• Taifa v. Bayh
  N.D. Indiana· 1994-11-04

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Haines v. Kerner
  Supreme Court· 1972-02-22· cited 26,103×
• Anant Kumar Tripati v. William C. Beaman
  Tenth Circuit· 1989-07-07· cited 363×
• In Re Sindram
  Supreme Court· 1991-02-19· cited 308×
• Robert H. Ketchum v. Salvador Cruz, M.D., Spanish Peaks Mental Health Center
  Tenth Circuit· 1992-04-13· cited 164×
• In Re Rainsford J. Winslow and Winifred W. Winslow, Debtors. Rainsford J. Winslow and Winifred W. Winslow v. C. Gail Hunter
  Tenth Circuit· 1994-02-23· cited 123×
• Olson v. Coleman
  Tenth Circuit· 1993-06-22· cited 15×

Other cases named DePineda v. Hemphill

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• DePINEDA v. HEMPHILL
  Tenth Circuit· 1994-08-29· cited 18×
• Depineda v. Hemphill
  Tenth Circuit· 1994-06-09· cited 2×