This is Me, Inc. v. Elizabeth Taylor, Zev Bufman, and Zev Bufman Entertainment, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that under New York law “all writings which form part of a single transaction and are designed to effectuate the same purpose [must] be read together” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• approving jury instruction that read, “[A]ll writings which form part of a single transaction and are designed to effectuate the same purpose [must] be read together_”
• “Under New York law, all writings forming part of a single transaction are to be read together.”
• “Under New York law, all writings forming part of a single transaction are to be read together.” (collecting cases)
• documents could be construed as part of the same transaction where they had singular purpose of securing actress Cicely Tyson’s appearance in a Broadway play
• “As long as there is 19 some evidence based upon which the jury could have held [the defendants] 20 individually liable, we must reinstate the verdict.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).