Skip to main content

Dennis v. State

Citations

  • 279 S.E.2d 275
  • 158 Ga. App. 142
  • 1981 Ga. App. LEXIS 2149

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that enticing a child for indecent purposes and aggravated sodomy are not included offenses because each had distinct elements
  • drawing same distinction between enticing a child for indecent purposes and aggravated sodomy
  • because records were cumulative of other testimony, defendant unable to show prejudice
  • evidence that defendant took child in his motor vehicle for purpose of indecent acts was sufficient to support conviction of enticing a child for indecent purposes, even where there was no evidence of enticing, inviting, or persuading victim to go with him
  • evidence that defendant took child in his motor vehicle for purpose of indecent acts was sufficient to support conviction of enticing a child for indecent purposes, even where there was no evidence of enticing, inviting, or persuading victim to go with him

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McMurray, Quillian, Pope

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.