Carolina v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the evidence was sufficient to sustain conviction under OCGA § 16-6-5 where the defendant asked the victim to go home with him to charge his cell phone, and after arriving home, the defendant asked the victim sexually suggestive questions
• affirming a conviction for solicitation of sodomy when an 11-year-old victim referred to the act of sodomy as “sex”
• enticement shown by evidence that defendant lured victim to his home under false pretense of needing to charge his cell phone
• victim’s testimony that defendant offered her money to make “him feel good” after discussing oral sex was sufficient to sustain conviction for solicitation of sodomy
• victim’s testimony that defendant offered her money to make “him feel good” after discussing oral sex was sufficient to sustain conviction for solicitation of sodomy
• sexual contact for purposes of Child Hearsay Statute can be merely verbal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).