California Court of Appeal· 8/30/2004
Denevi v. LGCC, LLC
Citations
- 18 Cal. Rptr. 3d 276
- 121 Cal. App. 4th 1211
- 2004 Daily Journal DAR 10723
- 2004 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7988
- 2004 Cal. App. LEXIS 1428
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Like corporate shareholders, members of a limited liability company hold no direct ownership interest in the company’s assets”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rushing
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Chapman v. Skype, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2013-10-04· cited 129×
- Rodriguez v. OtoCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2013-01-15· cited 62×
- Village Northridge Homeowners Assn. v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.California Supreme Court· 2010-08-30· cited 53×
- Orozco v. WPV San Jose, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2019-06-17· cited 50×
- Grigoryan v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.C.D. California· 2014-12-18· cited 23×
- Daly v. YessneCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2005-07-18· cited 17×
- Kwok v. Transnation Title Insurance CompanyCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2009-02-10· cited 15×
- Goles v. SawhneyCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2016-11-22· cited 14×
- Hilliard v. HarbourCalifornia Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2017-06-01· cited 10×
- Lopes v. VieiraE.D. California· 2007-05-30· cited 2×
- Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC v. Noble (In re R.E. Loans LLC)N.D. Texas· 2014-02-05· cited 2×
- Village Northridge Homeowners Ass'n v. State Farm and Cas. Co.California Court of Appeal· 2007-12-17
- Hilliard v. HarbourCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2017-06-16
- Sprengel v. ZbylutCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2019-10-07
- Sprengel v. ZbylutCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2019-11-04
- Holistic Supplements v. StarkCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2021-03-02
- Schrage v. SchrageCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2021-09-22
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court· 2001-07-11· cited 2,941×
- Lazar v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1996-01-29· cited 731×
- Jones v. H. F. Ahmanson & Co.California Supreme Court· 1969-11-07· cited 284×
- Bagdasarian v. GragnonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1948-04-30· cited 180×
- Wallis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1984-10-16· cited 108×
- Schmidt v. MesmerCalifornia Supreme Court· 1897-03-12· cited 88×
- Paclink Communications International, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2001-07-19· cited 80×
- Benavidez v. San Jose Police DepartmentCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1999-05-25· cited 67×
- Desaigoudar v. MeyercordCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2003-05-28· cited 30×
- Schied v. Bodinson Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal· 1947-04-14· cited 26×
- Southern Christian Leadership Conference v. Al Malaikah Auditorium Co.California Court of Appeal· 1991-05-17· cited 22×
- Karapetian v. CarolanCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1948-01-26· cited 18×
- Evans v. Rancho Royale Hotel Co.California Court of Appeal· 1952-12-02· cited 15×
- Smith v. Golden Eagle InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1999-02-16· cited 13×
- MacKenzie v. VoelkerCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1954-02-26· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.