Skip to main content

Demara v. Raymond Corp.

Citations

  • 221 Cal. Rptr. 3d 102
  • 13 Cal. App. 5th 545
  • 2017 Cal. App. LEXIS 623

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he consumer expectation test is not based on 19 minimum safety assumptions or expectations of consumers in general regarding a product but 20 rather, on the minimum safety assumptions or expectations of the product’s users.”
  • “In such a case, expert testimony is required.”
  • applying risk-benefit test under California law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Aaron

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.