Skip to main content

DeLong v. Yu Enterprises, Inc.

Citations

  • 47 P.3d 8
  • 334 Or. 166
  • 2002 Ore. LEXIS 377

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Historically, this court has recognized the application of an absolute privilege for defamatory state- ments in very limited circumstances.”
  • “We are satisfied that the prevailing common-law rule-that informal statements to police made before the initiation of criminal proceedings enjoy . . . a qualified privilege[.]”
  • “Generally, a qualified privilege exists to protect three kinds of statements: (1) those made to protect the defendant’s interests; (2) those made to protect the plaintiff’s employer’s interests; or (3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: De Muniz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named DeLong v. Yu Enterprises, Inc.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.