Oregon Supreme Court· 5/31/2002
DeLong v. Yu Enterprises, Inc.
Citations
- 47 P.3d 8
- 334 Or. 166
- 2002 Ore. LEXIS 377
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Historically, this court has recognized the application of an absolute privilege for defamatory state- ments in very limited circumstances.”
- “We are satisfied that the prevailing common-law rule-that informal statements to police made before the initiation of criminal proceedings enjoy . . . a qualified privilege[.]”
- “Generally, a qualified privilege exists to protect three kinds of statements: (1) those made to protect the defendant’s interests; (2) those made to protect the plaintiff’s employer’s interests; or (3
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: De Muniz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Allen v. LeMasterNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2011-12-05· cited 106×
- Morris v. Harvey Cycle and Camper, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois· 2009-06-12· cited 90×
- Gallo v. BarileSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-11-27· cited 41×
- Berian v. BerberianIdaho Supreme Court· 2020-11-02· cited 20×
- Johnson v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-05-12· cited 15×
- Brown v. GattiCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-10-13· cited 13×
- Chamberlain v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-10-23· cited 12×
- Tubra v. CookeCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-01-27· cited 8×
- Christianson v. State of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-12-15· cited 7×
- Sweet v. Tigard-Tualatin School DistrictNinth Circuit· 2005-01-05· cited 5×
- Lowell v. Medford School Dist. 549CCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-07-28· cited 4×
- Lowell v. Medford School Dist. 549COregon Supreme Court· 2022-07-28· cited 4×
- Hofer v. OHSUCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-05-18· cited 3×
- Martinez-Delacruz v. Stuart Olson Farms, Inc.D. Oregon· 2007-10-16· cited 2×
- Cler v. Providence Health System-OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-09-03· cited 2×
- Hoy v. Yamhill CountyD. Oregon· 2015-05-08
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court· 1999-02-04· cited 139×
- Ramstead v. MorganOregon Supreme Court· 1959-12-16· cited 106×
- Wallulis v. DymowskiOregon Supreme Court· 1996-06-20· cited 64×
- Bank of Oregon v. Independent News, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court· 1985-01-08· cited 53×
- Chard v. GaltonOregon Supreme Court· 1977-02-03· cited 43×
- Wattenburg v. United Medical Laboratories, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court· 1974-08-08· cited 37×
- Moore v. West Lawn Memorial Park, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court· 1973-08-02· cited 34×
- Grubb v. JOHNSONOregon Supreme Court· 1955-11-23· cited 28×
- Ducosin v. MottOregon Supreme Court· 1982-04-06· cited 17×
- Independent News, Inc. v. Bank of OregonSupreme Court· 1985-10-07· cited 13×
- Binder v. Oregon BankOregon Supreme Court· 1978-10-24· cited 12×
- DeLong v. Yu Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-11-01· cited 2×
Other cases named DeLong v. Yu Enterprises, Inc.
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.