Delgado v. Combs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the trial court erred by exercising jurisdiction under OCGA § 19-9-63 when there was a lack of evidence to support its conclusion that none of the parties still resided in Kansas
• looking to oases in other jurisdictions to resolve jurisdictional question under provisions of UCCJEA
• looking to cases in other jurisdictions to resolve jurisdictional question under provisions of UCCJEA
• “[B]ecause, under the UCCJEA, a new state may not modify an out-of-state child custody order unless it properly finds that the issuing state has been divested of jurisdiction (or declined to exercise it
• court lacked jurisdiction to modify foreign child custody order
• “In complying with the mandate that we consider the need to promote uniformity of the [UCCJEA] with respect to its subject matter among states that enact it, we, too, hold that OCGA § 19-9-92 applies only to the prevailing party in an enforcement proceeding.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).