Skip to main content
· 3/1/2010

Kuriatnyk v. Kuriatnyk

Citations

  • 690 S.E.2d 397
  • 286 Ga. 589
  • 2010 Fulton County D. Rep. 521
  • 2010 Ga. LEXIS 183

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “a motion for new trial ‘shall be decided’ after an ‘oral hearing’ ”
  • holding that, in pleadings, substance controls over nomenclature
  • holding that, in pleadings, substance controls over nomenclature
  • explaining that whether a post-judgment motion is for a new trial or to set aside depends upon whether the issues raised fall under OCGA § 9-11-60 (d), because “substance, rather than nomenclature, governs pleadings”
  • explaining that in pleadings, substance controls over nomenclature
  • explaining that “substance, rather than nomenclature, governs pleadings”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.