· 3/1/2010
Kuriatnyk v. Kuriatnyk
Citations
- 690 S.E.2d 397
- 286 Ga. 589
- 2010 Fulton County D. Rep. 521
- 2010 Ga. LEXIS 183
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “a motion for new trial ‘shall be decided’ after an ‘oral hearing’ ”
- holding that, in pleadings, substance controls over nomenclature
- holding that, in pleadings, substance controls over nomenclature
- explaining that whether a post-judgment motion is for a new trial or to set aside depends upon whether the issues raised fall under OCGA § 9-11-60 (d), because “substance, rather than nomenclature, governs pleadings”
- explaining that in pleadings, substance controls over nomenclature
- explaining that “substance, rather than nomenclature, governs pleadings”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Carley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.