Skip to main content
Third Circuit· 9/25/2009

Delaware River & Bay Authority v. Kopacz

Citations

  • 584 F.3d 622
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 21260
  • 2009 WL 3064708

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Its original purpose was clear and compelling—to ensure injured seamen funds adequate to cover basic living expenses during their recovery.”
  • prejudgment interest awards “must be compensatory rather than punitive”
  • prejudgment interest awards “must be compensatory rather than punitive”
  • prejudgment interest awards “must be compensatory rather than punitive”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rendell, Stapleton, Alarcón

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Delaware River & Bay Authority v. Kopacz

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.