Delacruz v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that officer’s explanation oí Miranda warnings was “incomplete and insufficient” because the officer “only asked if [defendant] understood that he did not have to answer questions” and “never ascertained that [defendant] understood all of his Miranda rights”
• holding that officer’s explanation of Miranda warnings was “incomplete and insufficient” because the officer “only asked if [defendant] understood that he did not have to answer questions” and “never ascertained that [defendant] understood all of his Miranda rights”
• successful controlled delivery of package containing marijuana

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Benton v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2017-10-30· cited 19×
• Ferguson v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 2011-06-24· cited 2×
• Commonwealth of Kentucky v. Kevin Master
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2024-12-19

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miranda v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
• North Carolina v. Butler
  Supreme Court· 1979-04-24· cited 2,172×
• Mills v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1999-04-22· cited 174×
• Stanford v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1990-05-24· cited 79×
• McCloud v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2009-06-25· cited 72×
• Crawley v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2003-06-12· cited 21×
• Olden v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2006-10-19· cited 7×